Triple
T22355233
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David Bryce |
E552633
|
entity |
| Predicate | employer |
P7
|
FINISHED |
| Object | William Burn |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: William Burn | Statement: [David Bryce, employer, William Burn]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: William Burn Context triple: [David Bryce, employer, William Burn]
-
A.
William Burn
chosen
William Burn was a prominent 19th-century Scottish architect known for his influential country house designs and contributions to the Scottish Baronial style.
-
B.
William Burnes
William Burnes was a Scottish farmer and the father of poet Robert Burns, best known for having the Burns Cottage built as the family home where Robert was born.
-
C.
Sir William Inglis
Sir William Inglis was a distinguished British Army officer of the Napoleonic era, renowned for his leadership and bravery in battles such as Albuera.
-
D.
William Henry Lambton
William Henry Lambton was a British Whig politician and landowner from the prominent Lambton family of County Durham in the late 18th and early 19th centuries.
-
E.
William Firth
William Firth is an individual known primarily as the sibling of Giuseppe Firth.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e4a0ad08190a385b4d343cf6524 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f157cf94508190b0f2c63ddfecb813 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:44 p.m.