Triple

T22346827
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ryoichi Hatayama E552413 entity
Predicate co-pilotingMethod P147865 FINISHED
Object drift compatibility LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: drift compatibility | Statement: [Ryoichi Hatayama, co-pilotingMethod, drift compatibility]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: co-pilotingMethod
Context triple: [Ryoichi Hatayama, co-pilotingMethod, drift compatibility]
  • A. coPilotedAircraft
    Indicates that the subject served as a co-pilot on the referenced aircraft.
  • B. canPilot
    Indicates that one entity has the ability or authorization to operate or control another entity, typically a vehicle or aircraft.
  • C. coPilotOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the co-pilot assisting and supporting another entity in operating or navigating a vehicle or craft.
  • D. hasPilotage
    Indicates a relationship where one entity provides or is subject to navigational guidance or piloting services by another entity.
  • E. pilotFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as the pilot operating or navigating a vehicle, aircraft, or vessel on behalf of another entity (such as an organization, mission, or owner).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e494eec81909c4d2d51f69499d9 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f157981c0881909ac74d68b99075c2 completed April 29, 2026, 12:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e7300c20088190a59e5bf9e70384f3 completed April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e7342ce08c8190bc0a7085f4a952e7 completed April 21, 2026, 8:24 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:43 p.m.