Triple
T22337871
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Azuis e Brancos |
E552197
|
entity |
| Predicate | colorRefersTo |
P60
|
FINISHED |
| Object | FC Porto home kit colors |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: FC Porto home kit colors | Statement: [Azuis e Brancos, colorRefersTo, FC Porto home kit colors]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colorRefersTo Context triple: [Azuis e Brancos, colorRefersTo, FC Porto home kit colors]
-
A.
colorReferenceExplains
Indicates that one color reference serves to clarify, define, or provide explanatory information about another color-related element or notation.
-
B.
colorIndicates
Indicates that a particular color serves as a sign, marker, or signal conveying specific information or status about something.
-
C.
colors
chosen
Indicates that one entity assigns, describes, or provides the color or colors of another entity.
-
D.
colorHasMeaning
Indicates that a particular color is associated with or conveys a specific meaning, symbolism, or significance.
-
E.
colorOrigin
Indicates the source or cause from which an entity’s color is derived or determined.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e494eec81909c4d2d51f69499d9 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f157804e60819094e2a903ace6f4b2 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e7300c20088190a59e5bf9e70384f3 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:43 p.m.