Triple

T22336393
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Plan L E552156 entity
Predicate tradesOff P28908 FINISHED
Object lower premiums for higher cost sharing LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lower premiums for higher cost sharing | Statement: [Plan L, tradesOff, lower premiums for higher cost sharing]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tradesOff
Context triple: [Plan L, tradesOff, lower premiums for higher cost sharing]
  • A. trades
    Indicates an exchange relationship where one party gives something of value to another in return for something else of value.
  • B. hasTradeoff chosen
    Indicates that one option or outcome involves a compromise in which gaining certain benefits requires accepting corresponding costs or disadvantages.
  • C. tradesAs
    Indicates that one entity conducts business or is publicly known under the trading name or brand of another entity.
  • D. tradeAspect
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is associated with a specific aspect, feature, or dimension of a trade or commercial transaction.
  • E. tradesDuring
    Indicates that a trading activity or transaction occurs within a specified time period or during a particular event or session.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e494eec81909c4d2d51f69499d9 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1577f2f208190ac6270ac4581fa15 completed April 29, 2026, 12:57 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e7300c20088190a59e5bf9e70384f3 completed April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:43 p.m.