Triple

T22330874
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MCAS E552017 entity
Predicate postAccidentChange P34334 FINISHED
Object use of two angle of attack sensors for activation logic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: use of two angle of attack sensors for activation logic | Statement: [MCAS, postAccidentChange, use of two angle of attack sensors for activation logic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: postAccidentChange
Context triple: [MCAS, postAccidentChange, use of two angle of attack sensors for activation logic]
  • A. hasAccidentAt
    Indicates that an accident involving a subject occurs at a specific location or time.
  • B. accident
    Indicates an unintended, unforeseen event or mishap occurring, often resulting in damage, injury, or disruption.
  • C. registrationStatusAfterAccident
    Indicates the state of an entity’s registration following the occurrence of an accident.
  • D. resultOfAccident chosen
    Indicates that something exists or occurs as a consequence or outcome of an accident.
  • E. involvedInAccident
    Indicates that an entity participated in, was affected by, or was otherwise a party to a specific accident or collision event.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e482f788190b78d1588fc26d606 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1577a9c348190b8662142afa832be completed April 29, 2026, 12:57 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e73004d9e88190bb862319a5aea06b completed April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:43 p.m.