Triple

T22310172
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tupiza E551489 entity
Predicate officialName P66 FINISHED
Object Tupiza NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tupiza | Statement: [Tupiza, officialName, Tupiza]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tupiza
Context triple: [Tupiza, officialName, Tupiza]
  • A. Tupiza chosen
    Tupiza is a small historic town in southern Bolivia known for its dramatic red-rock canyons and as a gateway to Andean landscapes and mining regions.
  • B. Tuspa
    Tuspa is an alternative name for Tushpa, the ancient capital city of the Urartian kingdom located near modern-day Lake Van in eastern Turkey.
  • C. Tumbalá
    Tumbalá is a municipality in the Mexican state of Chiapas, known for its lush jungle landscapes and proximity to popular natural attractions.
  • D. Tantamayo
    Tantamayo is a small Andean town in Peru known for its nearby pre-Inca archaeological sites and highland agricultural traditions.
  • E. Cojitambo
    Cojitambo is an ancient highland archaeological complex in Ecuador notable for its Cañari and later Inca ceremonial and military structures.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e46c0188190800181a4233f28fe completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1574d53148190a1ec07f849e1ae9d completed April 29, 2026, 12:56 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:42 p.m.