Triple

T22300884
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wajo dialect E551250 entity
Predicate ISO639-3CodeOfParentLanguage P36930 FINISHED
Object bug LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: bug | Statement: [Wajo dialect, ISO639-3CodeOfParentLanguage, bug]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ISO639-3CodeOfParentLanguage
Context triple: [Wajo dialect, ISO639-3CodeOfParentLanguage, bug]
  • A. sharesISO639-3CodeWith
    Indicates that two language entities share the same ISO 639-3 code, meaning they are treated as the same language in that coding system.
  • B. ISO639-3CodeOfLanguage chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the ISO 639-3 three-letter language code assigned to the language represented by the other entity.
  • C. ISO639-3ReferenceName
    Indicates the standardized reference name assigned to a language in the ISO 639-3 coding system.
  • D. ISO639-6Code
    Indicates the standardized ISO 639-6 four-letter code that uniquely identifies a specific language variety or dialect.
  • E. ISO639Macrolanguage
    Indicates that a language variety is part of a broader ISO 639-defined macrolanguage grouping that encompasses multiple closely related individual languages.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e46c0188190800181a4233f28fe completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1572399148190853c4e91fcf9f38c completed April 29, 2026, 12:56 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e72ffa438481908f80879aef2a589b completed April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:41 p.m.