Triple

T22284314
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Eastern Min E550817 entity
Predicate hasDialect P4251 FINISHED
Object Minqing dialect NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Minqing dialect | Statement: [Eastern Min, hasDialect, Minqing dialect]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Minqing dialect
Context triple: [Eastern Min, hasDialect, Minqing dialect]
  • A. Wuming dialect
    The Wuming dialect is a major variety of the Zhuang language that serves as the basis for its standardized form.
  • B. Qileng dialect
    The Qileng dialect is a regional variety of the Hezhen (Heilongjiang Jurchen) language spoken by the Hezhen ethnic minority in northeastern China.
  • C. Qimen dialect
    The Qimen dialect is a regional variety of Chinese spoken in Qimen County, Anhui, characterized by the phonological and lexical features typical of Huizhou Chinese.
  • D. Xinghua dialect chosen
    The Xinghua dialect is a regional variety of the Pu-Xian Min branch of Chinese, spoken primarily in parts of Fujian province.
  • E. Chaoshan dialect
    The Chaoshan dialect, also known as Teochew, is a Southern Min Chinese variety spoken primarily in the Chaoshan region of eastern Guangdong and by large overseas Chinese communities in Southeast Asia and beyond.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e44d538819097c6b8f333af3352 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f15605a8448190906a0ab9ffa4260b completed April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:40 p.m.