Triple
T22269014
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Original Soundtracks 1 |
E550425
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsInstrumentalTracks |
P140038
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yes | Statement: [Original Soundtracks 1, containsInstrumentalTracks, Yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsInstrumentalTracks Context triple: [Original Soundtracks 1, containsInstrumentalTracks, Yes]
-
A.
containsInstrumentalTrack
chosen
Indicates that one entity includes or features an instrumental music track as part of its content.
-
B.
isNonInstrumental
Indicates that the relationship or action occurs without using an instrument, tool, or intermediary means.
-
C.
hasInstrumentalPerformer
Indicates that an action, event, or work is performed or carried out by an entity serving as its instrumental performer.
-
D.
isInstrumental
Indicates that one entity serves as the means, tool, or instrument by which another entity performs an action or achieves an outcome.
-
E.
hasMainInstrumentalElements
Indicates that one entity includes or is characterized by the primary instrumental components or parts of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e43d8208190aff4f9cf7f2c2a8a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f141bde9f88190b533bcb88787b492 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 11:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e72ff0363081909f794d19c8a64837 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:40 p.m.