Triple

T22253437
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kimvita dialect E550037 entity
Predicate languageGroup P3349 FINISHED
Object Sabaki languages NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sabaki languages | Statement: [Kimvita dialect, languageGroup, Sabaki languages]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sabaki languages
Context triple: [Kimvita dialect, languageGroup, Sabaki languages]
  • A. Sabaki languages chosen
    The Sabaki languages are a subgroup of Bantu languages spoken along the East African coast and nearby regions, including well-known varieties such as Swahili.
  • B. Sena–Nyanja languages
    The Sena–Nyanja languages are a group of closely related Bantu languages spoken primarily in parts of Malawi, Mozambique, and neighboring regions of southeastern Africa.
  • C. Luhya languages
    The Luhya languages are a closely related group of Bantu languages spoken primarily by the Luhya people in western Kenya.
  • D. Bena–Mboi languages
    The Bena–Mboi languages are a small group of closely related Niger–Congo languages spoken primarily in northeastern Nigeria.
  • E. Bongo–Baka languages
    The Bongo–Baka languages are a subgroup of Central Sudanic languages spoken primarily in parts of South Sudan and neighboring regions.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e42adb8819087714772ea606709 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f138c0c4f48190a75473a7835014f1 completed April 28, 2026, 10:46 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:39 p.m.