Triple
T22240283
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pinault-Printemps-Redoute |
E549699
|
entity |
| Predicate | renamedAs |
P65
|
FINISHED |
| Object | PPR |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: PPR | Statement: [Pinault-Printemps-Redoute, renamedAs, PPR]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: PPR Context triple: [Pinault-Printemps-Redoute, renamedAs, PPR]
-
A.
PPR
PPR is an academic department at Lancaster University that integrates the study of politics, philosophy, and religion within a single interdisciplinary unit.
-
B.
PPR
PPR was a Dutch progressive political party known for its left-wing, green, and Christian-radical positions, active mainly in the 1970s and 1980s.
-
C.
PPR
PPR was the communist political party that led Poland in the final years of World War II and laid the foundations for the postwar socialist state.
-
D.
PPR
chosen
PPR was the former name of the French luxury group now known as Kering, which evolved from a retail and distribution conglomerate into a global luxury fashion powerhouse.
-
E.
PPR
PPR is the commonly used abbreviation for Philadelphia Parks & Recreation, the municipal department that manages the city’s parks, recreation centers, and related public programs.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e4102b881909cf47d3768e25c19 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f132133b908190b0fb32a5ee68e1e6 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 10:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:38 p.m.