Triple

T22223818
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fever (song) E549280 entity
Predicate hasMinimalistArrangement P46648 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Fever (song), hasMinimalistArrangement, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMinimalistArrangement
Context triple: [Fever (song), hasMinimalistArrangement, true]
  • A. hasMinimalistStyle
    Indicates that something exhibits a simple, clean, and uncluttered style with minimal decorative elements.
  • B. hasNotableArrangementFor
    Indicates that one entity is distinguished by a significant or noteworthy arrangement, configuration, or setup specifically made for another entity.
  • C. hasMinimalistProduction chosen
    Indicates that something is produced or arranged using a sparse, simple, and stripped-down style with minimal elements or embellishment.
  • D. isArrangementOf
    Indicates that one entity is a specific ordering or configuration of the components or elements of another entity.
  • E. hasArrangement
    Indicates that one entity possesses, follows, or is organized according to a particular configuration, setup, or ordering defined by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e403d6481909a94d0aaf157f6ef completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f12b92b79c8190a8a4d33591abd763 completed April 28, 2026, 9:50 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e71b4dcc408190a30429fb08fcf39e completed April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:37 p.m.