Triple
T22216213
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Existence of God |
E549078
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCounterArgumentType |
P141178
|
FINISHED |
| Object | problem of evil |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: problem of evil | Statement: [Existence of God, hasCounterArgumentType, problem of evil]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCounterArgumentType Context triple: [Existence of God, hasCounterArgumentType, problem of evil]
-
A.
hasArgument
Indicates that one entity serves as an argument (such as an input, parameter, or participant) in relation to another entity, typically a function, event, or statement.
-
B.
hasCounterSubject
Indicates that a subject is associated with another subject that serves as its counterpart, opposite, or contrasting entity in a given context.
-
C.
hasCounterexample
Indicates that there exists at least one specific case or instance that disproves or violates a given claim, rule, or general statement.
-
D.
hasOppositionType
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific kind or category of opposition it faces or represents.
-
E.
containsCounterpoint
Indicates that one element includes or incorporates another element that serves as a contrasting or opposing argument, idea, or perspective.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3f7e04819089806d81d5ac431e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f12b8c9d488190a59f571862997304 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b4dcc408190a30429fb08fcf39e |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:37 p.m.