Triple
T22215978
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Elisabeth–Descartes correspondence |
E549073
|
entity |
| Predicate | challengedViewOf |
P89960
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cartesian account of mind–body interaction |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cartesian account of mind–body interaction | Statement: [Elisabeth–Descartes correspondence, challengedViewOf, Cartesian account of mind–body interaction]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: challengedViewOf Context triple: [Elisabeth–Descartes correspondence, challengedViewOf, Cartesian account of mind–body interaction]
-
A.
challengesView
chosen
Indicates that one entity questions, disputes, or seeks to overturn another entity’s perspective, decision, or interpretation.
-
B.
challengedConcept
Indicates that one entity has questioned, disputed, or called into doubt the validity, accuracy, or applicability of a particular concept.
-
C.
viewOnControversy
Indicates a stance, opinion, or perspective that an entity holds regarding a controversial issue or topic.
-
D.
visionOf
Indicates that one entity is a visual representation, image, or depiction of another entity.
-
E.
challengedPractice
Indicates that one entity has questioned, disputed, or formally opposed the validity, appropriateness, or continuation of another entity’s practice or procedure.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3f7e04819089806d81d5ac431e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f12b8bdfbc8190832809edbe8b7c27 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b4dcc408190a30429fb08fcf39e |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:37 p.m.