Triple
T22197692
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Emilian dialects |
E548589
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional languages of Italy |
C22615
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional languages of Italy Context triple: [Emilian dialects, instanceOf, regional languages of Italy]
-
A.
Italian dialect
An Italian dialect is a regional or local variety of the Italian language, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features shaped by historical, cultural, and geographic influences.
-
B.
Emilian-Romagnol dialect
chosen
Emilian-Romagnol dialect is a group of closely related Gallo-Italic varieties spoken in the Emilia-Romagna region of northern Italy, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features that differentiate it from standard Italian and neighboring dialects.
-
C.
regional variety of the Piedmontese language
A regional variety of the Piedmontese language is a geographically localized form of Piedmontese characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and sometimes syntactic features shared by speakers in a specific area.
-
D.
Italic language branch
The Italic language branch is a subgroup of the Indo-European language family that includes Latin and its descendants (the Romance languages) as well as several extinct ancient languages once spoken on the Italian Peninsula.
-
E.
regional variety of Lombard
A regional variety of Lombard is a specific form of the Lombard language spoken in a particular geographic area, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and syntactic features.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3ecc7c8190b5f94cd8f42e9d37 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:36 p.m.