Triple

T22195665
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ronchamp E548539 entity
Predicate hasFunctionAtSite P146793 FINISHED
Object place of worship at Notre-Dame du Haut LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: place of worship at Notre-Dame du Haut | Statement: [Ronchamp, hasFunctionAtSite, place of worship at Notre-Dame du Haut]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFunctionAtSite
Context triple: [Ronchamp, hasFunctionAtSite, place of worship at Notre-Dame du Haut]
  • A. hasFunctionInContext
    Indicates that an entity serves a particular role or performs a specific function within a given context or situation.
  • B. hasFunctionInPresent
    Indicates that an entity currently performs, exhibits, or fulfills a specific function or role at the present time.
  • C. containsFunction
    Indicates that one entity includes, defines, or provides the implementation of a particular function.
  • D. hasFunctionDuring
    Indicates that an entity performs or exhibits a specific function only within a specified time period or temporal context.
  • E. hasFunctionInComplex
    Indicates that an entity performs a specific functional role within a larger molecular or structural complex.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3ecc7c8190b5f94cd8f42e9d37 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f12ae6f7a881908cf1772326f91467 completed April 28, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e71b48576c8190a8e93738fd9cfda5 completed April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e7222e74248190a2d3671049f117f2 completed April 21, 2026, 7:07 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:35 p.m.