Triple
T22191924
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Master Books |
E548447
|
entity |
| Predicate | approachToScience |
P6571
|
FINISHED |
| Object | creationist |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: creationist | Statement: [Master Books, approachToScience, creationist]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: approachToScience Context triple: [Master Books, approachToScience, creationist]
-
A.
hasScience
Indicates that an entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a particular scientific discipline, content, or attribute.
-
B.
consideredByScience
Indicates that something is regarded, evaluated, or treated as valid or relevant within the framework, methods, or consensus of scientific inquiry.
-
C.
researchApproach
Indicates the methodological strategy or set of methods used to conduct and structure a research activity or investigation.
-
D.
positionOnScience
chosen
Indicates the stance, viewpoint, or attitude an entity holds regarding science or scientific matters.
-
E.
approachToTheory
Indicates the manner, method, or conceptual framework by which a theory is examined, developed, or applied.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3e0c7c8190b30d278845e2497e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f12ae49ec881908fa42446b19e3f2d |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b48576c8190a8e93738fd9cfda5 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:35 p.m.