Triple
T22191561
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Allais paradox |
E548438
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | paradox in decision theory |
C6849
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: paradox in decision theory Context triple: [Allais paradox, instanceOf, paradox in decision theory]
-
A.
decision theory
chosen
Decision theory is the study of how agents should and do make rational choices under conditions of uncertainty, balancing preferences, probabilities, and outcomes.
-
B.
theory of rational choice under risk
A theory of rational choice under risk explains how individuals should make decisions among uncertain outcomes by systematically comparing the expected utilities of available options, given their probabilities and the decision-maker’s preferences.
-
C.
problem in confirmation theory
A problem in confirmation theory is a conceptual challenge or paradox that questions how evidence supports, undermines, or fails to affect the rational credibility of hypotheses.
-
D.
paradox in quantum foundations
A paradox in quantum foundations is a conceptual scenario or thought experiment that exposes apparent contradictions or tensions between quantum theory’s formalism, its interpretations, and our classical intuitions about reality, locality, and measurement.
-
E.
decision theorist
A decision theorist is someone who studies and develops formal frameworks for making rational choices under uncertainty, weighing probabilities, outcomes, and preferences to guide optimal decision-making.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3e0c7c8190b30d278845e2497e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:35 p.m.