Triple
T22188240
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chi |
E548349
|
entity |
| Predicate | inIgboThought |
P146774
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no person exists without a Chi |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no person exists without a Chi | Statement: [Chi, inIgboThought, no person exists without a Chi]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inIgboThought Context triple: [Chi, inIgboThought, no person exists without a Chi]
-
A.
in
Indicates that one entity is located within the spatial, temporal, or conceptual bounds of another entity.
-
B.
canBeThoughtBy
Indicates that something is capable of being conceived, imagined, or mentally represented by a thinking entity.
-
C.
reflectsIdeasOf
Indicates that one entity expresses, mirrors, or embodies the ideas, viewpoints, or conceptual content originating from another entity.
-
D.
languagePhilosophyType
Indicates a relationship where a particular philosophy is categorized or characterized by a specific type or school within the philosophy of language.
-
E.
intellectualTrend
Indicates a relationship where an idea, movement, or way of thinking is recognized as an intellectual trend influencing thought or discourse.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3e0c7c8190b30d278845e2497e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f12aab3d2c81908a3b5a5c127c4aac |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b48576c8190a8e93738fd9cfda5 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e7222e74248190a2d3671049f117f2 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:35 p.m.