Triple
T22187490
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rome Derby |
E548332
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasClubColorAssociation |
P103732
|
FINISHED |
| Object | AS Roma colors: yellow and red |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: AS Roma colors: yellow and red | Statement: [Rome Derby, hasClubColorAssociation, AS Roma colors: yellow and red]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasClubColorAssociation Context triple: [Rome Derby, hasClubColorAssociation, AS Roma colors: yellow and red]
-
A.
hasClubColor
chosen
Indicates that a club or team is associated with a specific color or set of colors used to represent it.
-
B.
primaryClubColorsVisible
Indicates that the primary colors associated with a club are clearly visible or prominently displayed.
-
C.
clubColoursPattern
Indicates the pattern or design style used in a club’s official colours (e.g., stripes, hoops, solid).
-
D.
hasClub
Indicates that an entity is associated with or belongs to a particular club.
-
E.
inspiredByClubColorsOf
Indicates that something derives its design, appearance, or theme from the colors associated with a particular club.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3e0c7c8190b30d278845e2497e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f12aaa32288190830f6dfc626fb26a |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b48576c8190a8e93738fd9cfda5 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:35 p.m.