Triple

T22186344
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fetiales E548305 entity
Predicate influenceOnLaterLaw P39579 FINISHED
Object concepts of international law in Roman thought LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: concepts of international law in Roman thought | Statement: [Fetiales, influenceOnLaterLaw, concepts of international law in Roman thought]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: influenceOnLaterLaw
Context triple: [Fetiales, influenceOnLaterLaw, concepts of international law in Roman thought]
  • A. influencedCourtDecision
    Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
  • B. legalDoctrineInfluenced
    Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
  • C. impactOnLaw chosen
    Indicates the effect or influence that one entity, event, or action has on laws, legal rules, or the legal system.
  • D. influencedByCourtCase
    Indicates that an entity’s state, decision, or development is shaped or altered as a result of a specific court case or its outcome.
  • E. courtInfluence
    Indicates that one party exerts or holds influence over decisions, outcomes, or behavior within a court or judicial setting.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3e0c7c8190b30d278845e2497e completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f12aa8f178819094d1556df5aee5b9 completed April 28, 2026, 9:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e71b48576c8190a8e93738fd9cfda5 completed April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:35 p.m.