Triple
T22147068
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab |
E547312
|
entity |
| Predicate | effectOnEarlierAmendments |
P125417
|
FINISHED |
| Object | did not invalidate previous constitutional amendments affecting fundamental rights |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: did not invalidate previous constitutional amendments affecting fundamental rights | Statement: [I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab, effectOnEarlierAmendments, did not invalidate previous constitutional amendments affecting fundamental rights]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: effectOnEarlierAmendments Context triple: [I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab, effectOnEarlierAmendments, did not invalidate previous constitutional amendments affecting fundamental rights]
-
A.
effectOfAmendments
Indicates the causal impact or consequences that specific amendments have on something, such as a law, document, or situation.
-
B.
hasAmendments
Indicates that one entity (such as a document, law, or agreement) includes or is associated with one or more modifications, changes, or additions made after its original creation.
-
C.
isAmendmentTo
Indicates that one item formally modifies, revises, or adds to the content or terms of another item.
-
D.
laterAmendedEffect
chosen
Indicates that one legal act or provision modifies or changes the effect of an earlier act or provision at a later point in time.
-
E.
amendmentAffectingSelection
Indicates that a legal or formal amendment changes how a selection or choice is made or determined.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3a95d88190a3bd80d9471976c3 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f129f156988190bc9a24a37418e849 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b384e008190b723c9a0f1089d66 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:33 p.m.