Triple
T22146202
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Stalowa Wola County |
E547293
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRuralGmina |
P46876
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Radomyśl nad Sanem |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Radomyśl nad Sanem | Statement: [Stalowa Wola County, hasRuralGmina, Radomyśl nad Sanem]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Radomyśl nad Sanem Context triple: [Stalowa Wola County, hasRuralGmina, Radomyśl nad Sanem]
-
A.
Radomyśl nad Sanem
chosen
Radomyśl nad Sanem is a village in southeastern Poland situated on the San River, known for its rural character and local administrative role within the Subcarpathian region.
-
B.
Mszana Dolna
Mszana Dolna is a small town in southern Poland situated in a picturesque valley surrounded by the mountains of the Western Beskids.
-
C.
Młociny
Młociny is a northern Warsaw neighborhood best known as the terminus of the city’s M1 metro line and a major transport hub.
-
D.
Pszczyna
Pszczyna is a historic town in southern Poland known for its well-preserved castle complex and picturesque old town.
-
E.
Tarnowskie Góry
Tarnowskie Góry is a historic town in southern Poland renowned for its UNESCO-listed silver, lead, and zinc mining heritage.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3a95d88190a3bd80d9471976c3 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f129f097248190a8a3cdff1593b5b5 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:43 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:33 p.m.