Triple

T22116064
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hooggeregshof van Appèl E546544 entity
Predicate highestFor P14338 FINISHED
Object non-constitutional matters in South Africa LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: non-constitutional matters in South Africa | Statement: [Hooggeregshof van Appèl, highestFor, non-constitutional matters in South Africa]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: highestFor
Context triple: [Hooggeregshof van Appèl, highestFor, non-constitutional matters in South Africa]
  • A. hasHighest
    Indicates that one entity possesses the greatest value, rank, or level in a specified attribute or set compared to all others.
  • B. highestPart
    Indicates that one entity is the topmost or uppermost portion of another entity.
  • C. formerHighest
    Indicates that an entity once held the highest rank, position, or status in a given context but no longer does.
  • D. highestOrgan chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the organ with the highest rank, level, or position within a specified system or hierarchy relative to another entity.
  • E. highestRanking
    Indicates that one entity holds the top or most senior rank relative to a set of other entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e38b3848190ac3a4fa97d56e65a completed April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1294dc1148190b95ff00f475a6713 completed April 28, 2026, 9:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e71b2ed7348190b6fa2e52f54393fb completed April 21, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:31 p.m.