Triple
T22109417
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 4787 |
E546374
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 5508 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 5508 | Statement: [RFC 4787, relatedTo, RFC 5508]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 5508 Context triple: [RFC 4787, relatedTo, RFC 5508]
-
A.
RFC 5508
chosen
RFC 5508 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standards document that specifies requirements and mechanisms related to IP networking, later refined and updated by RFC 6146.
-
B.
RFC 5308
RFC 5308 is the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) specification that extends the IS-IS routing protocol to support IPv6 addressing and routing.
-
C.
RFC 5838
RFC 5838 is an IETF specification that updates and extends OSPFv3 to support multiple address families, including IPv4 and IPv6, within a single protocol instance.
-
D.
RFC 5780
RFC 5780 is an IETF standard that extends the STUN protocol to help diagnose and characterize NAT and firewall behavior for improved NAT traversal.
-
E.
RFC 7158
RFC 7158 is an IETF specification that updates and clarifies the JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) data interchange format previously defined in RFC 4627.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e378dc08190896d6a51597afd5a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1291b9c988190b3ddd06d1f40dc78 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:30 p.m.