Triple
T22109224
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Castelo de Abrantes |
E546370
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Linha do Tejo defensive system |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Linha do Tejo defensive system | Statement: [Castelo de Abrantes, partOf, Linha do Tejo defensive system]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Linha do Tejo defensive system Context triple: [Castelo de Abrantes, partOf, Linha do Tejo defensive system]
-
A.
Cruces River defenses
The Cruces River defenses were a coordinated system of colonial-era fortifications designed to protect the approaches to Valdivia, Chile, along the Cruces River.
-
B.
Bocachica channel defenses
The Bocachica channel defenses were a strategic system of coastal fortifications guarding the main seaward entrance to Cartagena de Indias, crucial in repelling naval assaults such as the 1741 British attack.
-
C.
Monte Brasil fortifications
The Monte Brasil fortifications are a historic coastal defense complex on the volcanic peninsula overlooking Angra do Heroísmo in the Azores, built primarily in the 16th–17th centuries to protect the strategic Atlantic port.
-
D.
Crimean defensive system
The Crimean defensive system was a network of fortifications and natural barriers designed to protect the Crimean Peninsula from invasions, particularly across its narrow northern isthmuses.
-
E.
Bocachica defensive works
The Bocachica defensive works were a key system of coastal fortifications guarding the main seaward entrance to Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, and played a crucial role in the city's colonial-era defenses.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Linha do Tejo defensive system Target entity description: The Linha do Tejo defensive system was a network of fortifications along the Tagus River in Portugal designed to protect the interior of the country and its capital from invasion.
-
A.
Cruces River defenses
The Cruces River defenses were a coordinated system of colonial-era fortifications designed to protect the approaches to Valdivia, Chile, along the Cruces River.
-
B.
Bocachica channel defenses
The Bocachica channel defenses were a strategic system of coastal fortifications guarding the main seaward entrance to Cartagena de Indias, crucial in repelling naval assaults such as the 1741 British attack.
-
C.
Monte Brasil fortifications
The Monte Brasil fortifications are a historic coastal defense complex on the volcanic peninsula overlooking Angra do Heroísmo in the Azores, built primarily in the 16th–17th centuries to protect the strategic Atlantic port.
-
D.
Crimean defensive system
The Crimean defensive system was a network of fortifications and natural barriers designed to protect the Crimean Peninsula from invasions, particularly across its narrow northern isthmuses.
-
E.
Bocachica defensive works
The Bocachica defensive works were a key system of coastal fortifications guarding the main seaward entrance to Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, and played a crucial role in the city's colonial-era defenses.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e378dc08190896d6a51597afd5a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1291b9c988190b3ddd06d1f40dc78 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:30 p.m.