Triple
T22106581
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wankaner State |
E546301
|
entity |
| Predicate | formerCapitalOf |
P3417
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Wankaner State |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wankaner State | Statement: [Wankaner State, formerCapitalOf, Wankaner State]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Wankaner State Context triple: [Wankaner State, formerCapitalOf, Wankaner State]
-
A.
Wankaner State
chosen
Wankaner State was a former princely state in western India, historically governed by rulers from the Jhala Rajput dynasty.
-
B.
Morvi State
Morvi State was a former princely state in western India, historically governed by the Jadeja Rajput dynasty.
-
C.
Kothi State
Kothi State was a small princely state in central India that formed part of the Bagelkhand Agency during the British colonial period.
-
D.
Dhar State
Dhar State was a former princely state in central India, historically ruled by the Pawar (Parmar) Maratha dynasty with its capital at the town of Dhar.
-
E.
Jhabua State
Jhabua State was a former princely state in western India, located in what is now Madhya Pradesh and historically ruled by Rajput chiefs under British suzerainty.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e378dc08190896d6a51597afd5a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f12919dd388190b8ca08e2464cb0b8 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:30 p.m.