Triple
T22093237
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Shallows |
E545959
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSharkAntagonist |
P146957
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [The Shallows, hasSharkAntagonist, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSharkAntagonist Context triple: [The Shallows, hasSharkAntagonist, yes]
-
A.
hasAntagonisticProtagonist
Indicates that the work features a main character who opposes or undermines the typical heroic or moral expectations of a traditional protagonist.
-
B.
hasVillain
Indicates that one entity is the villain or primary antagonist associated with another entity.
-
C.
antagonistOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity actively opposes, conflicts with, or serves as an adversary to another.
-
D.
SharksTries
Indicates an attempt or effort made by sharks to perform an action or achieve a particular outcome.
-
E.
antagonistActionOf
Indicates that one entity performs an action in opposition or hostility toward another entity, acting as its antagonist.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e36d03c8190a83a1ba802b7231b |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f128e6b1d881909bf0f4a52199354c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b20ec50819096ac196c798f8e3c |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e7222d208c819098b12c13e31af629 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:29 p.m.