Triple

T22086119
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Armstrongism E545780 entity
Predicate theologicalRoot P146915 FINISHED
Object teachings of Herbert W. Armstrong LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: teachings of Herbert W. Armstrong | Statement: [Armstrongism, theologicalRoot, teachings of Herbert W. Armstrong]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: theologicalRoot
Context triple: [Armstrongism, theologicalRoot, teachings of Herbert W. Armstrong]
  • A. theologicalConcept
    Indicates that something is a religious or theological idea, doctrine, or principle within a belief system.
  • B. theologicalCategory
    Indicates the classification of something according to a particular theological type, tradition, or doctrinal category.
  • C. theologicalFocus
    Indicates that something is primarily concerned with, centered on, or directed toward theological themes, questions, or doctrines.
  • D. theologicalTradition
    Indicates the religious or doctrinal school, lineage, or system of belief within which an entity’s theology is developed or practiced.
  • E. theologicalField
    Indicates that something pertains to or is categorized within a specific area or branch of theology.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3523488190badd54b5d580c00d completed April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f128ba24ac819082fc4aa274553481 completed April 28, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e71b20ec50819096ac196c798f8e3c completed April 21, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e7222d208c819098b12c13e31af629 completed April 21, 2026, 7:07 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:29 p.m.