Triple

T22082610
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Vahcuengh E545688 entity
Predicate hasPhonemicOrthography P75920 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Vahcuengh, hasPhonemicOrthography, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPhonemicOrthography
Context triple: [Vahcuengh, hasPhonemicOrthography, yes]
  • A. hasPhonemicPrinciple chosen
    Indicates that one entity employs or is based on a phonemic principle in relation to another entity (such as a writing system reflecting distinct phonemes of a language).
  • B. hasPhonemicVowels
    Indicates that a language or linguistic system distinguishes vowel sounds as separate phonemes that can change word meaning.
  • C. hasPhonologicalStandard
    Indicates that one entity serves as the accepted or prescribed phonological norm or standard for the pronunciation system of another entity.
  • D. hasPhoneme
    Indicates that a linguistic unit (such as a word or morpheme) contains or includes a particular phoneme as part of its sound structure.
  • E. usesPhoneticSystem
    Indicates that one entity employs or is based on a particular phonetic system for representing or encoding sounds.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3523488190badd54b5d580c00d completed April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f128b706288190945c0c37e5ff2756 completed April 28, 2026, 9:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e71b20ec50819096ac196c798f8e3c completed April 21, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:28 p.m.