Triple

T22061466
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Illinois v. Krull E545161 entity
Predicate legalIssue P1640 FINISHED
Object Fourth Amendment search and seizure — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fourth Amendment search and seizure | Statement: [Illinois v. Krull, legalIssue, Fourth Amendment search and seizure]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Fourth Amendment search and seizure
Context triple: [Illinois v. Krull, legalIssue, Fourth Amendment search and seizure]
  • A. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution chosen
    The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, requiring warrants to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause.
  • B. Kyllo v. United States
    Kyllo v. United States is a landmark 2001 U.S. Supreme Court case that held using sense-enhancing technology to obtain information from inside a home without a warrant constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment.
  • C. United States Constitution (criminal procedure protections)
    The United States Constitution’s criminal procedure protections are the set of fundamental rights—such as due process, fair trial guarantees, and safeguards against unreasonable searches and self-incrimination—that govern how criminal investigations and prosecutions must be conducted.
  • D. Illinois v. Gates
    Illinois v. Gates is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the "totality of the circumstances" test for determining whether an informant’s tip provides probable cause for issuing a search warrant.
  • E. Florida v. Jardines
    Florida v. Jardines is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held using a drug-sniffing dog on a homeowner’s porch constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, requiring a warrant.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3377c48190890c17407b9527d6 completed April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1285d5e508190b3124a70fe55b32e completed April 28, 2026, 9:36 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:27 p.m.