Triple

T22061429
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Arizona v. Evans E545160 entity
Predicate extendedDoctrine P137215 FINISHED
Object good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule | Statement: [Arizona v. Evans, extendedDoctrine, good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: extendedDoctrine
Context triple: [Arizona v. Evans, extendedDoctrine, good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule]
  • A. extendsDoctrineTo chosen
    Indicates that a doctrine, principle, or rule is applied or carried over from one context, entity, or domain to another, broadening its scope or coverage.
  • B. extendsDoctrineFrom
    Indicates that one doctrine is derived, developed, or expanded from another existing doctrine.
  • C. sharesDoctrine
    Indicates that two entities adhere to or promote the same doctrine, belief system, or set of principles.
  • D. reinforcedDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity strengthened, supported, or further entrenched a particular doctrine or set of beliefs in another entity or context.
  • E. definedDoctrineAt
    Indicates that a particular doctrine was formally established, articulated, or codified at a specific place or time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3377c48190890c17407b9527d6 completed April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1285d5e508190b3124a70fe55b32e completed April 28, 2026, 9:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6f643ca74819083e8ab78e843f243 completed April 21, 2026, 4 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:27 p.m.