Triple
T22058636
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tarnobrzeg County |
E545087
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Bogoria |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Bogoria | Statement: [Tarnobrzeg County, contains, Gmina Bogoria]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Bogoria Context triple: [Tarnobrzeg County, contains, Gmina Bogoria]
-
A.
Gmina Bogoria
chosen
Gmina Bogoria is a rural administrative district in south-central Poland, known for its agricultural character and small villages within the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
B.
Gmina Morąg
Gmina Morąg is an urban-rural administrative district in northern Poland’s Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship, centered on the town of Morąg.
-
C.
Gmina Bolesław
Gmina Bolesław is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
D.
Gmina Gorlice
Gmina Gorlice is an administrative district in southern Poland that encompasses the town of Gorlice and surrounding rural areas.
-
E.
Gmina Góra
Gmina Góra is an administrative district and urban-rural municipality in southwestern Poland, centered on the town of Góra in the Lower Silesian Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3377c48190890c17407b9527d6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1285959f48190b89527b3f9e7ab11 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:27 p.m.