Triple
T22058635
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tarnobrzeg County |
E545087
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Rytwiany |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Rytwiany | Statement: [Tarnobrzeg County, contains, Gmina Rytwiany]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Rytwiany Context triple: [Tarnobrzeg County, contains, Gmina Rytwiany]
-
A.
Gmina Rytwiany
chosen
Gmina Rytwiany is a rural administrative district in south-central Poland, known for its agricultural landscape and small villages.
-
B.
Gmina Rytro
Gmina Rytro is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, situated in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship and known for its mountainous landscapes in the Beskid Sądecki range.
-
C.
Gmina Ryki
Gmina Ryki is an administrative district (gmina) in eastern Poland that includes the town of Ryki and surrounding rural areas.
-
D.
Gmina Ryglice
Gmina Ryglice is an administrative district (gmina) in southern Poland that includes the town of Ryglice and surrounding rural areas.
-
E.
Gmina Rymanów
Gmina Rymanów is an administrative district in southeastern Poland that includes the town of Rymanów and surrounding rural areas.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3377c48190890c17407b9527d6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1285959f48190b89527b3f9e7ab11 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:27 p.m.