Triple
T22058630
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tarnobrzeg County |
E545087
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Przecław |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Przecław | Statement: [Tarnobrzeg County, contains, Gmina Przecław]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Przecław Context triple: [Tarnobrzeg County, contains, Gmina Przecław]
-
A.
Gmina Przecław
chosen
Gmina Przecław is a rural administrative district (gmina) in southeastern Poland, known for its agricultural character and small villages within the Subcarpathian Voivodeship.
-
B.
Gmina Przeciszów
Gmina Przeciszów is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
C.
Gmina Prabuty
Gmina Prabuty is an administrative district (gmina) in northern Poland that encompasses the town of Prabuty and its surrounding rural areas.
-
D.
Gmina Pęcław
Gmina Pęcław is a rural administrative district in southwestern Poland, situated in the Lower Silesian Voivodeship.
-
E.
Gmina Siepraw
Gmina Siepraw is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3377c48190890c17407b9527d6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1285959f48190b89527b3f9e7ab11 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:27 p.m.