Triple
T22052427
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pat Quinn |
E544916
|
entity |
| Predicate | ethicsActions |
P146416
|
FINISHED |
| Object | supported campaign finance reform measures in Illinois |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: supported campaign finance reform measures in Illinois | Statement: [Pat Quinn, ethicsActions, supported campaign finance reform measures in Illinois]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethicsActions Context triple: [Pat Quinn, ethicsActions, supported campaign finance reform measures in Illinois]
-
A.
ethicsAssessment
Indicates that an entity has been evaluated or judged according to ethical principles, standards, or guidelines.
-
B.
functionInEthics
Indicates that something serves a particular role, purpose, or contribution within the domain of ethics or ethical theory.
-
C.
ethicalDebate
Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, questioning, or disputing the moral rightness or wrongness of actions, policies, or principles.
-
D.
ethicalConnotation
Indicates that one entity is associated with a positive, negative, or otherwise specific moral or ethical evaluation in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
typeOfEthics
Indicates a relationship where one concept specifies the particular kind or category of ethics that another concept belongs to or is governed by.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e32445c8190ab97089b48a130bb |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1285513fc8190b691e1f57085956f |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6f643ca74819083e8ab78e843f243 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e6fad4a540819096cdd5ea08527220 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:26 p.m.