Triple

T22049455
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Andy Flower E544844 entity
Predicate odiDismissalsAsKeeper P146398 FINISHED
Object 173 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 173 | Statement: [Andy Flower, odiDismissalsAsKeeper, 173]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: odiDismissalsAsKeeper
Context triple: [Andy Flower, odiDismissalsAsKeeper, 173]
  • A. goalkeeperAction
    Indicates actions performed by a goalkeeper in the context of defending the goal, such as saving, catching, blocking, or distributing the ball.
  • B. infringementByGoalkeeperOutcome
    Indicates that a rules infringement committed by the goalkeeper has led to a specific recorded outcome or result in the context of play.
  • C. playerSentOff
    Indicates that a player has been dismissed from the game, typically due to a serious rule violation, and is no longer allowed to participate.
  • D. goalkeeperException
    Indicates an exception or special case that applies specifically to a goalkeeper within an otherwise standard rule, condition, or relationship.
  • E. goalkeeperFaced
    Indicates that a goalkeeper encountered and had to respond to a particular shot, attempt, or offensive action during play.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e32445c8190ab97089b48a130bb completed April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f128323fb08190b9592fd08a96cba0 completed April 28, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6f643ca74819083e8ab78e843f243 completed April 21, 2026, 4 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e6fad4a540819096cdd5ea08527220 completed April 21, 2026, 4:19 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:26 p.m.