Triple

T22045919
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Funningsfjørður E544762 entity
Predicate nearbySettlement P350 FINISHED
Object Gjógv NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gjógv | Statement: [Funningsfjørður, nearbySettlement, Gjógv]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gjógv
Context triple: [Funningsfjørður, nearbySettlement, Gjógv]
  • A. Gjógv chosen
    Gjógv is a small, picturesque village on the Faroe Islands’ island of Eysturoy, known for its dramatic sea-filled gorge and traditional turf-roofed houses.
  • B. Slíðrugtanni
    Slíðrugtanni is an alternative name for Gullinbursti, the golden-bristled boar associated with the Norse god Freyr.
  • C. Gestaþáttr
    Gestaþáttr is a section of the Old Norse poem Hávamál that offers practical wisdom and ethical guidelines for guests and hosts in Viking Age society.
  • D. Hjálmar
    Hjálmar is a masculine given name of Old Norse origin, traditionally used in Scandinavian countries.
  • E. Erlingr
    Erlingr is a variant form of the Scandinavian given name Erling, traditionally associated with Norse and Germanic origins.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e32445c8190ab97089b48a130bb completed April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1282e647481908e054b3ad19e2c15 completed April 28, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:26 p.m.