Triple
T22039594
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mattel |
E544302
|
entity |
| Predicate | holdsRightsIn |
P27209
|
FINISHED |
| Object | merchandising |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: merchandising | Statement: [Mattel, holdsRightsIn, merchandising]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: holdsRightsIn Context triple: [Mattel, holdsRightsIn, merchandising]
-
A.
holdsIn
Indicates that a relationship, condition, or event is valid or occurs within a specified time interval or temporal context.
-
B.
holdsTo
Indicates that one entity maintains, adheres, or remains committed to another entity, such as a belief, standard, agreement, or condition.
-
C.
heldRight
Indicates that one entity is being held on the right side of another entity.
-
D.
holdsFor
Indicates that a particular relationship or condition remains true over a specified interval or duration of time.
-
E.
holdsUnder
chosen
Indicates that one entity maintains possession, control, or validity of another entity subject to certain conditions, constraints, or a specific context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e2f98c8819083e11eab90942a78 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f127f532b08190be80c5af039b4c29 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6f63b0d048190b241622759aab9de |
completed | April 21, 2026, 3:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:25 p.m.