Triple
T22037967
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | FUN! |
E544258
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsWordplay |
P83584
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [FUN!, containsWordplay, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsWordplay Context triple: [FUN!, containsWordplay, true]
-
A.
isPlayOnWordsWith
Indicates a relationship where one expression is a pun or wordplay that depends on, echoes, or cleverly twists the wording or meaning of another expression.
-
B.
taglineWordplay
chosen
Indicates that a tagline employs wordplay, such as puns, double meanings, or playful language, as a key part of its expression.
-
C.
usesDoubleEntendre
Indicates that one entity employs language or expressions with a double meaning, often to convey a hidden or suggestive message alongside a literal one.
-
D.
containsPlayWithinPlay
Indicates that one play or dramatic work includes another play performed or depicted within its own narrative.
-
E.
spellingGimmick
Indicates a distinctive or unconventional way of spelling something used for effect or branding rather than standard orthography.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e2f98c8819083e11eab90942a78 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f127f32edc81909b6898af6621f56f |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6f63b0d048190b241622759aab9de |
completed | April 21, 2026, 3:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:25 p.m.