Triple
T22028557
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | English ecclesiastical courts |
E544025
|
entity |
| Predicate | lostJurisdictionTo |
P50740
|
FINISHED |
| Object | civil courts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: civil courts | Statement: [English ecclesiastical courts, lostJurisdictionTo, civil courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lostJurisdictionTo Context triple: [English ecclesiastical courts, lostJurisdictionTo, civil courts]
-
A.
lostClaimTo
Indicates that one entity previously held a right or ownership over something but no longer retains that claim, often due to transfer, forfeiture, or invalidation.
-
B.
jurisdictionTransferred
chosen
Indicates that legal authority or control over a matter, case, or entity has been moved from one jurisdiction to another.
-
C.
affectedJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one entity’s authority, control, or legal power extends over and impacts the jurisdiction of another entity.
-
D.
claimsJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one authority or governing body asserts legal power or control over a particular area, matter, or entity.
-
E.
fledJurisdiction
Indicates that an entity has intentionally left a legal jurisdiction, typically to avoid legal proceedings, obligations, or enforcement there.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e2f98c8819083e11eab90942a78 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f127cdf5c08190ac804664d6e56fe2 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6f63b0d048190b241622759aab9de |
completed | April 21, 2026, 3:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:24 p.m.