Triple
T22011604
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | On Mind |
E543588
|
entity |
| Predicate | evidenceBasis |
P143137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | later testimonia and doxography |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: later testimonia and doxography | Statement: [On Mind, evidenceBasis, later testimonia and doxography]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: evidenceBasis Context triple: [On Mind, evidenceBasis, later testimonia and doxography]
-
A.
providesEvidenceFor
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
-
B.
evidenceCited
Indicates that one entity is used as supporting evidence or citation for the claims or content of another entity.
-
C.
epistemicBasis
chosen
Indicates the justificatory relationship by which one piece of information, belief, or evidence serves as the basis for holding another belief or knowledge claim.
-
D.
empiricalBasis
Indicates that one entity serves as the empirical evidence, data, or observational support underpinning the validity or justification of another entity.
-
E.
usedEvidenceType
Indicates that a particular type or category of evidence was employed or relied upon in a given context or activity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e2db934819095556760c7d85e4d |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f127a520bc8190865f525a87255fb2 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6f62dc9d88190ae387f145f9528de |
completed | April 21, 2026, 3:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:22 p.m.