Triple
T22008432
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vedangas |
E543510
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasComponent |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nirukta |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nirukta | Statement: [Vedangas, hasComponent, Nirukta]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nirukta Context triple: [Vedangas, hasComponent, Nirukta]
-
A.
Nirukta
chosen
Nirukta is one of the six classical Vedangas of Hindu scholarship, focused on explaining the etymology and semantic interpretation of Vedic words and passages.
-
B.
Mahābhāṣya
Mahābhāṣya is Patañjali’s monumental and authoritative commentary on Pāṇini’s Aṣṭādhyāyī, foundational to the classical Sanskrit grammatical tradition.
-
C.
Bhashya
Bhashya is a traditional Sanskrit commentary genre that provides detailed exegesis and philosophical interpretation of authoritative Hindu scriptures.
-
D.
Anubhashya
Anubhashya is a Sanskrit commentary on the Brahma Sutras composed by the Hindu philosopher Vallabhacharya, foundational to the Pushtimarg (Path of Grace) tradition.
-
E.
Dattilam
Dattilam is an ancient Sanskrit treatise that systematically outlines the foundational theories and practices of early Indian classical music.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e2db934819095556760c7d85e4d |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f127a2aebc8190951ee0bf9fd8e16d |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:21 p.m.