Triple
T2200277
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Annuit cœptis |
E50471
|
entity |
| Predicate | traditionalMeaning |
P12511
|
FINISHED |
| Object | He has favored our undertakings |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: He has favored our undertakings | Statement: [Annuit cœptis, traditionalMeaning, He has favored our undertakings]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalMeaning Context triple: [Annuit cœptis, traditionalMeaning, He has favored our undertakings]
-
A.
commonMeaning
Indicates that multiple entities share the same or very similar meaning or semantic interpretation.
-
B.
originalMeaning
chosen
Indicates that something retains or conveys its initial, intended sense or significance, as opposed to a later or altered interpretation.
-
C.
possibleMeaning
Indicates that something may plausibly represent, signify, or be interpreted as a particular meaning or sense.
-
D.
meaningOfPhrase
Indicates that one entity expresses or defines the semantic content or interpretation of a given phrase.
-
E.
semanticRootMeaning
Indicates the fundamental or core meaning that underlies a word, phrase, or expression in a semantic structure.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88b044ab48190add007487680f009 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbfa06bb4819092d7021358846e5f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbda706f4819094de73e1d1d1f539 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:46 p.m.