Triple
T21998760
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Central Economic Intelligence Bureau |
E543270
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfOffenceMonitored |
P67290
|
FINISHED |
| Object | economic offence |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: economic offence | Statement: [Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, typeOfOffenceMonitored, economic offence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfOffenceMonitored Context triple: [Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, typeOfOffenceMonitored, economic offence]
-
A.
offenceCognizable
Indicates that the offence is of a type for which police may initiate investigation and arrest without requiring prior permission or a warrant from a magistrate.
-
B.
targetOffenderType
Indicates the specific category or type of offender that an action, rule, or condition is directed toward.
-
C.
crimeCharged
Indicates that legal authorities have formally accused an entity of committing a specific crime.
-
D.
includesOffenseType
chosen
Indicates that one entity contains, specifies, or is associated with a particular category or type of offense.
-
E.
isCriminalizedIn
Indicates that a specific behavior, action, or condition is prohibited and subject to legal penalties within a particular jurisdiction or legal system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e2c814c8190837d072789000486 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f12768c0088190b0c8d5cd9b7bf710 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6f62dc9d88190ae387f145f9528de |
completed | April 21, 2026, 3:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:19 p.m.