Triple
T21988971
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sakharov conditions |
E543034
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatesTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | CPT theorem |
—
|
NE GENERATED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: CPT theorem Context triple: [Sakharov conditions, relatesTo, CPT theorem]
-
A.
CPT theorem
chosen
The CPT theorem is a fundamental result in quantum field theory stating that any Lorentz-invariant local quantum field theory with a Hermitian Hamiltonian is invariant under the combined operations of charge conjugation (C), parity transformation (P), and time reversal (T).
-
B.
Noether's theorem
Noether's theorem is a fundamental result in theoretical physics and mathematics that links continuous symmetries of a physical system to corresponding conservation laws, such as energy or momentum conservation.
-
C.
spin–statistics theorem
The spin–statistics theorem is a fundamental result in quantum field theory that links a particle’s intrinsic spin to the type of quantum statistics it obeys, explaining why fermions obey the Pauli exclusion principle while bosons do not.
-
D.
CP symmetry
CP symmetry is a fundamental principle in particle physics stating that the laws of physics should remain unchanged when particles are replaced by their antiparticles and their spatial coordinates are inverted.
-
E.
Wigner’s theorem on symmetry transformations
Wigner’s theorem on symmetry transformations is a fundamental result in quantum mechanics stating that any symmetry of transition probabilities is represented by either a unitary or antiunitary operator on the system’s Hilbert space.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c48136b081908831fa907cc02e18 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:05 p.m.