Triple
T21974831
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edward Baldwin, 4th Earl Baldwin of Bewdley |
E542676
|
entity |
| Predicate | regainedSeatAsElectedHereditaryPeer |
P146113
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1999 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1999 | Statement: [Edward Baldwin, 4th Earl Baldwin of Bewdley, regainedSeatAsElectedHereditaryPeer, 1999]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: regainedSeatAsElectedHereditaryPeer Context triple: [Edward Baldwin, 4th Earl Baldwin of Bewdley, regainedSeatAsElectedHereditaryPeer, 1999]
-
A.
successorAsLordOf
Indicates that one entity takes over the role or title of lord from another entity, becoming their direct successor in that lordship.
-
B.
regardsAsRightfulSuccessorOf
Indicates that one entity recognizes or treats another entity as the legitimate heir or next in line to assume a particular role, position, or status.
-
C.
successorAsEarl
Indicates that one person became the next holder of the title of Earl after another person.
-
D.
succeededByRegencyFor
Indicates that an entity’s rule or authority is followed by a period in which another party governs on its behalf as a regency.
-
E.
attemptedToAppointAsSuccessor
Indicates that one entity tried, but did not necessarily succeed, to designate another entity as its successor.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c48070988190909db97667b9a0ac |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f12487a1a88190abb8a51fcd533b6a |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6f6154e408190acc5b2c278acaff4 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 3:59 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e6fad4a540819096cdd5ea08527220 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:03 p.m.