Triple

T21936105
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article 124B of the Constitution of India E541691 entity
Predicate struckDownInCase P25040 FINISHED
Object Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015) — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015) | Statement: [Article 124B of the Constitution of India, struckDownInCase, Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015)
Context triple: [Article 124B of the Constitution of India, struckDownInCase, Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015)]
  • A. Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015) chosen
    Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015) is a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India that reaffirmed judicial primacy in the appointment of judges by invalidating the National Judicial Appointments Commission and related constitutional amendments.
  • B. National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India
    National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India is a landmark 2014 Supreme Court of India judgment that legally recognized transgender people as a third gender and affirmed their fundamental rights and entitlement to affirmative action.
  • C. Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India
    Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India is a landmark 2017 Supreme Court of India judgment that unanimously affirmed the fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution.
  • D. Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India
    Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India was a Supreme Court of India decision that had upheld the constitutionality of the adultery offence under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code before it was later invalidated.
  • E. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
    Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India is a landmark 2018 Supreme Court of India judgment that decriminalized consensual same-sex relations by reading down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and affirming constitutional protections for LGBTQ+ rights.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c47e2e5c81909a7f74ce3de50911 completed April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f124048fe48190987340d5a6945176 completed April 28, 2026, 9:17 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 7:53 p.m.