Triple
T2192590
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Coat of arms of Groningen (province) |
E49895
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageOfOfficialBlazon |
P36678
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dutch |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dutch | Statement: [Coat of arms of Groningen (province), languageOfOfficialBlazon, Dutch]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOfOfficialBlazon Context triple: [Coat of arms of Groningen (province), languageOfOfficialBlazon, Dutch]
-
A.
coatOfArmsMotto
Indicates the phrase or motto that appears on or is officially associated with a particular coat of arms.
-
B.
officialLanguageOnFlag
Indicates that a particular language is officially represented in the text or inscriptions displayed on a flag.
-
C.
governingHeraldicAuthority
Indicates the official heraldic body or authority that has jurisdiction over, regulates, or grants the heraldic item in question.
-
D.
coatOfArms
Indicates that one entity serves as the heraldic emblem or coat of arms representing another entity.
-
E.
emblemLanguage
Indicates that an emblem (such as a symbol or logo) is associated with or presented in a particular language.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88aaba3c48190b351cab9b26989ff |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbf48ceb48190956df39377df0548 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbda52328819089c7ab111bebb0ca |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abbea8bd4881908f72019a5acf6174 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:59 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:46 p.m.