Triple

T2190894
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Andrew Jackson presidential election E49857 entity
Predicate hasPopularVoteForLoser P36640 FINISHED
Object 500897 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 500897 | Statement: [Andrew Jackson presidential election, hasPopularVoteForLoser, 500897]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPopularVoteForLoser
Context triple: [Andrew Jackson presidential election, hasPopularVoteForLoser, 500897]
  • A. popularVoteLoser
    Indicates that the subject became the winner of an election despite receiving fewer popular votes than at least one opponent.
  • B. popularVotePercentageLoser
    Indicates the percentage of the total popular vote received by the candidate or party that did not win the election.
  • C. popularVoteWinner
    Indicates that the subject is the candidate who received the highest number of individual votes cast by the electorate in an election.
  • D. smithPopularVote
    Indicates that Smith received a specified number or share of votes in a popular vote election or ballot.
  • E. popularVoteRunnerUp
    Indicates that one entity is the candidate who received the second-highest number of votes in a popular vote for the other entity’s election or contest.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88aaba3c48190b351cab9b26989ff completed March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abbf3f5e008190beda3ce5d77209e0 completed March 7, 2026, 6:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abbda52328819089c7ab111bebb0ca completed March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abbea8bd4881908f72019a5acf6174 completed March 7, 2026, 5:59 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:46 p.m.